Defence Why PM Modi's statement "No Chinese Inclusion" turned controversial ? Centre gives...

Why PM Modi’s statement “No Chinese Inclusion” turned controversial ? Centre gives clarification

PM Narendra Modi
Photo – Reuters

Yesterday at all parties meet PM Modi said that there had been no intrusion or take-over of any Indian post. This statement by PM Modi quickly become so controversial that government forced to issued a clarification.

“Neither has anyone intruded upon our borders, not is anyone currently intruding, nor is any Indian post in the hands of anyone else,” PM Modi said in all party meet. “In Ladakh, 20 of our soldiers have died but those who have raised their eyes at Bharat Mata, they have been taught a lesson.”

This statement leaves out many unanswered questions, If China didn’t enter Indian territory, then how did they ‘erect a structure’ on our soil as pointed out by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar in call with his Chinese Counterpart.

How did 20 soldiers die, 76 get injured and 10 allegedly captured ? There’s like a bubble of confusion created after PM Modi statement.

Also Read:- China’s real intention behind the increase transgressions at LAC

What actually External Affairs Minister said in a issued statement after a Phone call with Chinese Foreign Minister.

“At the meeting of senior Military Commanders held on 6th June, an agreement was reached on de-escalation and disengagement along the Line of Actual Control. Ground commanders were meeting regularly to implement this consensus throughout the last week.

While there was some progress, the Chinese side sought to erect a structure in Galwan valley on our side of the LAC. While this became a source of dispute, the Chinese side took pre-meditated and planned action that was directly responsible for the resulting violence and casualties. It reflected an intent to change the facts on ground in violation of all our agreements to not change the status quo.”

In the statement it is clearly mentioned that “the Chinese side sought to erect a structure in Galwan valley on our side of the LAC”.

Now how did Chinese was able to erect a structure on our side of the LAC without intruding into our land. S Jaishankar also said that “It reflected an intent to change the facts on ground in violation of all our agreements to not change the status quo.”

Also Read:- Vivo and IPL sponsorship deal in danger after India-China face off

Again the same question arising if Chinese didn’t intruded how did they violating the agreement to not change the ‘status quo’.

Note:- To maintain the status quo is to keep things the way they presently are.

Pm Modi statement overruled his own minister statement. Many opposition leaders also raised the same question.

How did 20 soldiers die, 76 get injured and 10 allegedly captured ?

According to official records the Indian Army intervened when Chinese side sought to erect an structure on Indian side of LAC. Now if no intrusion has taken place than this means that What Chinese saying about Indian Army is true.

“Indian Army had carried out “provocative attacks” on Chinese soldiers after “illegally crossing” the border”, this is what Chinese media reported and unfortunately the statement of our Prime Minister helped Chinese to gain advantage over the situation.

Center clarification on PM Modi’s comments

“Prime Minister’s observations that there was no Chinese presence on our side of the LAC pertained to the situation as a consequence of the bravery of our armed forces. The sacrifices of the soldiers of the 16 Bihar Regiment foiled the attempt of the Chinese side to erect structures and also cleared the attempted transgression at this point of the LAC on that day,” the government has said in today’s clarification.

“In fact, he specifically emphasized that in contrast to the past neglect of such challenges, Indian forces now decisively counter any violations of LAC. Those who tried to transgress our land were taught a befitting lesson by our brave sons of soil,” the statement added.

Though the centre came out with a clarification but failed to explain the most controversial remark of PM Modi statement.

Aditya Raj
Writer & Co-founder of InfotOnline.

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

Astra missile soon to be tested from LCA Tejas, will increase BVR capability

DRDO developed, India's first Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missile (BVRAAM) Astra is soon to be tested from indigenous Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas. LCA Tejas...

The Undertaker Final Farewell: Here’s how the World paid their respect to the Deadman

THE UNDERTAKER FINAL FAREWELL #Undertaker30 Mark Calaway, known by the ring name as 'The Undertaker' had bid his final goodbye to World Wrestling Entertainment on...

HAL Intermediate Jet Trainer Sitara commenced Spin flight testing

Indigenously designed and developed,  Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) Intermediate Jet Trainer (IJT) also known as 'Sitara' commenced spin flight testing in Bengaluru. "The spin testing...

End of an Era: ‘The Undertaker’ Bids Adieu to the Wrestling Fraternity

The most famous name of the World Wrestling Entertainment 'The Undertaker' hanged his boots on a highly decorated 30-year career in WWE. He bid...